Re: [patch 43/69] i386: HPET, check if the counter works

On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 13:33 -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Thomas Gleixner ([email protected]) wrote:
> > What happened to the maxcpus=1 hard lock prevention patch ?
> 
> i placed it in the queue for .3.  (primarily due to timing and since it
> hadn't hit upstream yet).

Fair enough.

	tglx


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [patch 00/69] -stable review
  - From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
- [patch 43/69] i386: HPET, check if the counter works
  - From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 43/69] i386: HPET, check if the counter works
  - From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 43/69] i386: HPET, check if the counter works
  - From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 43/69] i386: HPET, check if the counter works
  - From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH]serial: make early_uart to use early_param instead of console_initcall
Next by Date: Re: + signalfd-retrieve-multiple-signals-with-one-read-call.patch added to -mm tree
Previous by thread: Re: [patch 43/69] i386: HPET, check if the counter works
Next by thread: Re: [patch 43/69] i386: HPET, check if the counter works
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]