-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
---------------------
From: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>
The function xfrm_policy_byid takes a dir argument but finds the policy
using the index instead. We only use the dir argument to update the
policy count for that direction. Since the user can supply any value
for dir, this can corrupt our policy count.
I know this is the problem because a few days ago I was deleting
policies by hand using indicies and accidentally typed in the wrong
direction. It still deleted the policy and at the time I thought
that was cool. In retrospect it isn't such a good idea :)
I decided against letting it delete the policy anyway just in case
we ever remove the connection between indicies and direction.
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
---
net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
--- linux-2.6.21.1.orig/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
+++ linux-2.6.21.1/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
@@ -782,6 +782,10 @@ struct xfrm_policy *xfrm_policy_byid(u8
struct hlist_head *chain;
struct hlist_node *entry;
+ *err = -ENOENT;
+ if (xfrm_policy_id2dir(id) != dir)
+ return NULL;
+
*err = 0;
write_lock_bh(&xfrm_policy_lock);
chain = xfrm_policy_byidx + idx_hash(id);
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
