Re: second, bigger problem with private futexes

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Do you mean POSIX allowed to mix PROCESS_PRIVATE and PROCESS_SHARED
> condvar and mutexes ? Seems silly to me :(

Don't judge what you don't understand.  If all waiters are always in one
process but the notifiers can be in different processes, this setup
might make a lot of sense.

- --
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGUeRK2ijCOnn/RHQRAqRuAKCpc7cmhsnwfclz1DU81RNXRjm68ACgosZc
RqWca4r+Ya54dp5zNztkYuk=
=sW/1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: second, bigger problem with private futexes
    • From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>

• References:
  • second, bigger problem with private futexes
    • From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
  • Re: second, bigger problem with private futexes
    • From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PROBLEM] 2.6.22-rc2 panics on x86-64 with slub
• Next by Date: Re: Sched - graphic smoothness under load - cfs-v13 sd-0.48
• Previous by thread: Re: second, bigger problem with private futexes
• Next by thread: Re: second, bigger problem with private futexes
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]