Am Montag, 21. Mai 2007 18:37 schrieben Sie:
> On 5/21/07, Ken Chen <[email protected]> wrote:
> > yes and no. in that commit, I automatically create n+1 device when
> > loop device n is created, allergically was tested to be fine with
> > casual usage of "losetup" and "mount -o loop". However, there is a
> > bug in that commit when loop.c was compiled as a module. And when Al
> > fixed it, he also removed that magic "n+1" trick.
> >
> > Nevertheless, yes, I'm guilty of introducing the new behavior.
>
> The easiest way is to reinstate max_loop and create "max_loop" device
> up front at module load time. However, that will lose all the "fancy
> on-demand device instantiation feature".
>
> So I propose we do the following:
>
> 1. have the module honor "max_loop" parameter and create that many
> device upfront on module load (max_loop will also be a hard max) iff
> user specify the parameter.
> 2. if max_loop is not specified, default create 8 loop device. User
> can extent more loop device by create device node themselves and have
> kernel automatically instantiate loop device on-demand.
Sorry, Ken:
My question on point 2 would be: Does "User can extent more loop device by
create device node themselves and......." correspond or conflict to working
with udev?
>
> Is this acceptable? Patch in a bit.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]