Re: [PATCH]serial: make early_uart to use early_prarm instead of console_initcall

Andi Kleen wrote:

It is someone's reimplemention of earlyprintk= for another architecture
that happens to mostly work on x86 too because the code is not ifdeffed.I don't think it makes much sense on x86 though because earlyprintk exists.


Andi,

Bjorn refer to your early_printk to implement early_uart for ia64 platform. code is almost identical, but it could take
mmio,0xfe00000,9600n8 etc. or say mmio type serial card.

YH
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH]serial: make early_uart to use early_prarm instead of console_initcall
  - From: Yinghai Lu <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH]serial: make early_uart to use early_prarm instead of console_initcall
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH]serial: make early_uart to use early_prarm instead of console_initcall
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: bug in 2.6.22-rc2: loop mount limited to one single iso image
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] shrink task_struct by 16 bytes
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH]serial: make early_uart to use early_prarm instead of console_initcall
Next by thread: why only one use of "create_freezeable_workqueue"?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]