Re: [PATCH]serial: make early_uart to use early_prarm instead of console_initcall

Andi Kleen wrote:

It is someone's reimplemention of earlyprintk= for another architecture

that happens to mostly work on x86 too because the code is not ifdeffed. I don't think it makes much sense on x86 though because earlyprintk exists.

Andi,

Bjorn refer to your early_printk to implement early_uart for ia64 platform. code is almost identical, but it could take
mmio,0xfe00000,9600n8 etc. or say mmio type serial card.

YH
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH]serial: make early_uart to use early_prarm instead of console_initcall
    • From: Yinghai Lu <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH]serial: make early_uart to use early_prarm instead of console_initcall
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH]serial: make early_uart to use early_prarm instead of console_initcall
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: bug in 2.6.22-rc2: loop mount limited to one single iso image
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] shrink task_struct by 16 bytes
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH]serial: make early_uart to use early_prarm instead of console_initcall
• Next by thread: why only one use of "create_freezeable_workqueue"?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]