From: William Lee Irwin III <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 04:37:47 -0700
> This could be awkward with allocation requirements. How about an
> open-addressed hash table? It can be made so large as to never
> need to expand in advance with a very small constant factor space
> overhead.
I was just thinking of a normal hash table with entries that
looked simply like:
struct page_big_count_hash {
struct page_big_count_hash *next; /* or list_head or hlist_head etc. */
struct page *key;
atomic64_t count;
};
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
