On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 03:19:46AM -0700, Bill Huey wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 11:36:39AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > you got the history wrong i think: the first version of lockdep was
> > released to lkml a year ago (May 2006), while the first time you
> > mentioned your lock contention patch was November 2006 and you released
> > it to lkml in December 2006 - so it was _you_ who was "replicating the
> > same work", not lockdep :-) And this was pointed out to you very early
> > on, many months ago.
>
> Yeah, and where do we disagree here again ? So I take it you're disagreeing
> with my agreement with you that lockdep came first ? Geez, think about that
> one for a bit. (chuckle) :)
Yeah, sorry about the wording reversal. It was unintentional. I tend to drop
minor words like "not" and stuff which can create confusion.
bill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
