Re: [PATCH] UDF: check for allocated memory for inode data

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun 20-05-07 16:20:10, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> [Christoph Hellwig - Wed, May 16, 2007 at 06:56:00PM +0100]
> | On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 09:52:57PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> | > I've that documants even printed ;) Actually they are _very-very_ big
> | > indeed. I don't know may be just try to bring this code into Linux
> | > codying style?
> | 
> | That's probably a good step.  And while converting things to a proper
> | style you'll surely find various bugs and thinkgs you could improve.
> | Write them down somewhere and work on fixing them.  And make sure every
> | actualy fix or behaviour change is a single patch separated from the
> | cleanups.
> | 
> 
> Hi Christoph,
> 
> I almost have completed UDF style conversation (the only thing to do
> is to check all I've changed). And I've been striked down by the simple
> question: the conversion I've done is over 2.6.22-rc1 but meantime in -mm
> tree two my patches already exist so should I take them into account while
> converting UDF style?
  I guess Andrew would be most grateful if you counted with these two
patches...

									Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <[email protected]>
SuSE CR Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux