> > I don't want to say the values aren't useful. I simply think there is > > a high noiselevel. > > The noise is reflected in the standard deviation he has on those rows. > The average +- stdev of one overlaps the average +- stdev of the > other, For the fairness test on cfs13 this simply is wrong. And for the test to be stable would require that avg of one is within avg+-stddev of the other (simple overlap does not suffice). Best, Michael -- Technosis GmbH, Geschäftsführer: Michael Gerdau, Tobias Dittmar Sitz Hamburg; HRB 89145 Amtsgericht Hamburg Vote against SPAM - see http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/ Michael Gerdau email: [email protected] GPG-keys available on request or at public keyserver
Attachment:
pgpr7u5J2eU01.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Sched - graphic smoothness under load - cfs-v13 sd-0.48
- From: "Ray Lee" <[email protected]>
- Re: Sched - graphic smoothness under load - cfs-v13 sd-0.48
- References:
- Sched - graphic smoothness under load - cfs-v13 sd-0.48
- From: Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>
- Re: Sched - graphic smoothness under load - cfs-v13 sd-0.48
- From: Michael Gerdau <[email protected]>
- Re: Sched - graphic smoothness under load - cfs-v13 sd-0.48
- From: "Ray Lee" <[email protected]>
- Sched - graphic smoothness under load - cfs-v13 sd-0.48
- Prev by Date: Re: bug in 2.6.22-rc2: loop mount limited to one single iso image
- Next by Date: Re: [SMP BUG] [clockevents: i386 drivers patch] introduces irqbalance-does-not-work-properly problem
- Previous by thread: Re: Sched - graphic smoothness under load - cfs-v13 sd-0.48
- Next by thread: Re: Sched - graphic smoothness under load - cfs-v13 sd-0.48
- Index(es):
 |