* Anant Nitya <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> Please ignore my last report about lag problem while using CFS-v13, it
> is working perfectly fine with 2.6.21.1 and the lag I used to see in
> v12 is not there with v13 anymore. [...]
ah, great - i was looking over your debug data and couldnt find the
problem! This moves CFS into the "no open regressions" state again ;-)
> [...] After digging in a bit I found that problem is only occurring in
> 2.6.22-rc1 and it get fired by network usage while transmitting data
> upstream. I don't have any evidence that CFS is involved in lag
> problem since 2.6.22-rc1 with stock scheduler is also having same lag
> problem and it seems directly proportional with upstream speed while
> downstream doesn't shows any misbehavior { at lower upstream speed lag
> is less but with higher upstream speed system starts crawling and
> system load hitting to 70/75}. Lets see how 2.6.22-rc2 is doing.
if that lag still occurs with rc2 then please repeat the following
debugging steps under CFS [which has more instrumentation than the stock
scheduler]:
cat /proc/`pidof firefox-bin`/sched > sched1.txt
echo 0 > /proc/`pidof firefox-bin`/sched
< reproduce the lag in firefox >
cat /proc/`pidof firefox-bin`/sched > sched2.txt
this way we'll be able to tell what nature this delay has. Also, could
you send me your kernel's .config (off-list)?
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
