Re: [PATCH] sata_sil: Greatly improve DMA support

Jeff Garzik wrote:

rotfl. Boy am I dumb. I -thought- my patch, written months ago, included that bit. But obviously it does not. Let's add that...

Or not. It just gets rid of the 64k boundary -and- allows for larger scatter/gather entries. LBT does not add 64-bit DMA support.

That answers that :) Thanks for poking me to take a trip down memory lane...

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH] sata_sil: Greatly improve DMA support
    • From: Robert Hancock <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sata_sil: Greatly improve DMA support
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] sata_sil: Greatly improve DMA support
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending with tickless plip
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] sata_sil: Greatly improve DMA support
• Next by thread: [PATCH] sata_mv: new exception handling (hotplug, NCQ framework)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]