Re: [PATCH] LogFS take three

David Weinehall wrote:
> > It is also the filesystem that tries to scale logarithmically, as Arnd
> > has noted.  Maybe I should call it Log2 to emphesize this point.  Log1
> > would be horrible scalability.
> 
> So, log2fs...  Sounds great to me.

Why Log2?  Logarithmic scaling is just logarithmic scaling.  Does the
filesystem use 2-ary trees or anything else which gives particular
meaning to 2?

-- Jamie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] LogFS take three
    • From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] LogFS take three
    • From: Jörn Engel <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] LogFS take three
    • From: Jörn Engel <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] LogFS take three
    • From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] LogFS take three
    • From: Jörn Engel <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] LogFS take three
    • From: Jamie Lokier <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] LogFS take three
    • From: Jörn Engel <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] LogFS take three
    • From: Jörn Engel <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] LogFS take three
    • From: David Weinehall <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: gcc-4.2.0 breakage on powerpc?
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] sata_sil: Greatly improve DMA support
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] LogFS take three
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] LogFS take three
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]