On Fri, 18 May 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Fri, 18 May 2007 14:46:02 -0700 Linda Walsh wrote:
> > If the standard that other architectures are using is to put their
> > devices in the crypto directory, then one might expect all crypto
> > devices to be there. Why should s390 stick out and put its crypto
> > device someplace under the s390 tree, forcing parts of the s390
> > tree to be included when building other architectures?
>
> drivers/crypto/ currently contains drivers for x86_32 and s390 (the
> latter by indirection, which is what is causing you this
> grief/problem/whatever), but it certainly looks like it could be a
> home for crypto drivers on any arch.
this all sounds vaguely familiar. oh, wait ...
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/28/212
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
