Re: [patch] x86_64, irq: check remote IRR bit before migrating level triggered irq

On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 12:02:16PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> I will look closer but I do believe that from the ioapic to the cpu the 2.6.21
> code should be fairly robust with respect to inflight messages from the ioapic
> to the local apics and the cpus.  What I failed to consider were inflight
> messages in the other direction arriving out of order.

Yes. Inflight messages from cpu to ioapic was what I was referring to.

thanks,
suresh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [patch] x86_64, irq: check remote IRR bit before migrating level triggered irq
    • From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] x86_64, irq: check remote IRR bit before migrating level triggered irq
    • From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)

• Prev by Date: Re: ht CPU flag
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm modesetting core
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch] x86_64, irq: check remote IRR bit before migrating level triggered irq
• Next by thread: Re: [patch] x86_64, irq: check remote IRR bit before migrating level triggered irq
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]