Re: [patch] x86_64, irq: check remote IRR bit before migrating level triggered irq

On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 12:02:16PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> I will look closer but I do believe that from the ioapic to the cpu the 2.6.21
> code should be fairly robust with respect to inflight messages from the ioapic
> to the local apics and the cpus.  What I failed to consider were inflight
> messages in the other direction arriving out of order.

Yes. Inflight messages from cpu to ioapic was what I was referring to.

thanks,
suresh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Re: [patch] x86_64, irq: check remote IRR bit before migrating level triggered irq
  - From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] x86_64, irq: check remote IRR bit before migrating level triggered irq
  - From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)

Prev by Date: Re: ht CPU flag
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm modesetting core
Previous by thread: Re: [patch] x86_64, irq: check remote IRR bit before migrating level triggered irq
Next by thread: Re: [patch] x86_64, irq: check remote IRR bit before migrating level triggered irq
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]