Re: [patch] x86_64, irq: check remote IRR bit before migrating level triggered irq

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On 5/18/07, Eric W. Biederman <[email protected]> wrote:
We can solve the problem without doing that, and keeping the same
vector number during migration keeps x86 from scaling.
I mean ioapic level irq couls be limited. new device could use MSI or
HT irq directly and less irq routing problem.

Personally I would prefer to disallow irq migration.
? typo?
For amd platform with different hypertransport chain on different
nodes, irq migration is needed.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux