Peter wrote:
> cpusets are ignored when in dire straights for an kernel alloc.
No - most kernel allocations never ignore cpusets.
The ones marked NOFAIL or ATOMIC can ignore cpusets in dire straights
and the ones off interrupts lack an applicable cpuset context.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH 0/5] make slab gfp fair
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] make slab gfp fair
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] make slab gfp fair
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] make slab gfp fair
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] make slab gfp fair
- From: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] make slab gfp fair
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] make slab gfp fair
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] make slab gfp fair
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] make slab gfp fair
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] make slab gfp fair
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] make slab gfp fair
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 0/5] make slab gfp fair
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Make prepare_namespace() wait for devices
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/5] make slab gfp fair
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/5] make slab gfp fair
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/5] make slab gfp fair
- Index(es):
 |