Re: [BUG] local_softirq_pending storm

[Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>]

On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 12:11 +0530, Anant Nitya wrote:
> On Friday 11 May 2007 03:28:46 Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> 
> > Ok, that's consistent with earlier reports. The problem surfaces when
> > one of the SMT-"cpus" goes idle. The problem goes away when you disable
> > hyperthreading.
> Yes with HT disabled in BIOS there is no local_softirq_pending messages. BTW 
> why does this problem persist only with X ? 

No idea. I uploaded a debug patch against 2.6.22-rc1 to

http://www.tglx.de/private/tglx/2.6.22-rc1-hrt-debug.patch

Can you give it a try and report the output ?

> > When you apply the ratelimit patch, does the softlockup problem
> > persist ?
> >
> Yes, though softlockup is rare and mostly hit when system is under high load. 
> Apart of that I am also getting following messages consistently across 
> multiple boot cycles with NOHZ=y and ratelimit patch applied.
> 
> May 15 11:51:22 rudra kernel: [ 2594.341068] Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = 
> 28111260302 ns)
> May 15 11:51:22 rudra kernel: [ 2594.343194] Time: acpi_pm clocksource has 
> been installed.

That's informal. The TSC is detected to be unstable and replaced by the
pm timer. Nothing to worry about. It happens with NOHZ=n as well,
right ?

	tglx


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/