On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 09:35:17AM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 10:52:03PM +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote: ... > 3. The alternative solution without barriers, based on the > idea of Tejun Heo and presented in the patch proposal from > 2007-05-13, could be probably a little faster (for some > processors), after some changes: I mean "a little faster" than current version. Of course the second change is needed for other, discussed reasons. Jarek P. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [PATCH] make cancel_rearming_delayed_work() reliable
- From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] make cancel_rearming_delayed_work() reliable
- From: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] make cancel_rearming_delayed_work() reliable
- From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] make cancel_rearming_delayed_work() reliable
- From: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] make cancel_rearming_delayed_work() reliable
- From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] make cancel_rearming_delayed_work() reliable
- From: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] make cancel_rearming_delayed_work() reliable
- From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] make cancel_rearming_delayed_work() reliable
- From: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] make cancel_rearming_delayed_work() reliable
- From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] make cancel_rearming_delayed_work() reliable
- From: Jarek Poplawski <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] make cancel_rearming_delayed_work() reliable
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] MM: use DIV_ROUND_UP() in mm/memory.c
- Next by Date: Re: v2.6.21-rt3
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] make cancel_rearming_delayed_work() reliable
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] make cancel_rearming_delayed_work() reliable
- Index(es):
 |