On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 01:56:24PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Artem Bityutskiy <[email protected]>
> Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 17:50:43 +0300
>
> > Well, I see the good side of your change - no home-brewed media<->cpu
> > things. Fair enough and nice. But why don't you make __be32 a struct
> > (just like I do) so that compiler could complain then?
>
> structs get passed on the stack instead of via registers, regardless
> of size, when passed as arguments on some architectures, so there is a
> terrible performance cost of doing things that way
BTW, the lack of home-grown coversions is not a benefit - it's _nice_ to
have protections against mixing be32 and ubi32, etc. Avoiding the mess
with struct, OTOH, *is* a benefit.
So I'd rather go with independent bitwise types and conversions done by
use of be... ones + force-cast. The rest of ubi code remain unchanged.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
