Re: [PATCH] INPUT: Sanitize PIT locking in pcspkr

Hi Thomas,

+#include <asm/i8253.h>

I don't see this file in include/asm-i386 and your patch only creates
asm-x86_64...
BTW, is there any reason 8253pit.h can't be used...?

Hmm... The best way IMO woudl be if arch code attached spinlock that
should be used by pcspkr driver to pcspkr platform device (as
platform_data) and we would not have private lock at all.

BTW, with all that usevent_supress busiess, does pcspkr gets loaded
automatically nowadays?

--
Dmitry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] INPUT: Sanitize PIT locking in pcspkr
    • From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] INPUT: Sanitize PIT locking in pcspkr
    • From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [linux-usb-devel] ark3116: receive returns negative
• Next by Date: [PATCH 1/6][TAKE4] fallocate() implementation on i86, x86_64 and powerpc
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] INPUT: Sanitize PIT locking in pcspkr
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] INPUT: Sanitize PIT locking in pcspkr
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]