Re: [PATCH] recalc_sigpending_tsk fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/16, Roland McGrath wrote:
> 
> + * After recalculating TIF_SIGPENDING, we need to make sure the task wakes up.
> + * This is superfluous when called on current, the wakeup is a harmless no-op.
> + */
> +void recalc_sigpending_and_wake(struct task_struct *t)
> +{
> +	if (recalc_sigpending_tsk(t))
> +		signal_wake_up(t, 0);
>  }

We already discussed this, this is not so important, but how about

	void recalc_sigpending_and_wake(struct task_struct *t)
	{
		int was_pending = signal_pending(t);

		if (recalc_sigpending_tsk(t) && !was_pending)
			signal_wake_up(t, 0);
	}

?

This "was_pending" is more a documenation than a optimization.

Oleg.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux