On Wed, 16 May 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: > (I hope. Might have race windows in which the percpu_counter_sum() count is > inaccurate?) The question is how do these race windows affect the locking scheme? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] scalable rw_mutex
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] scalable rw_mutex
- References:
- [PATCH 0/2] convert mmap_sem to a scalable rw_mutex
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 1/2] scalable rw_mutex
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] scalable rw_mutex
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] scalable rw_mutex
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] scalable rw_mutex
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] scalable rw_mutex
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] scalable rw_mutex
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] scalable rw_mutex
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 0/2] convert mmap_sem to a scalable rw_mutex
- Prev by Date: Re: [2/3] 2.6.22-rc1: known regressions v2 - XFS
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/5][TAKE3] fallocate() implementation on i86, x86_64 and powerpc
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] scalable rw_mutex
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] scalable rw_mutex
- Index(es):
 |