Re: 2.6.22-rc1-mm1

["Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@us.ibm.com>]

On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 01:04:59AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:

> > Looks like SAS needs to require CONFIG_ATA...
> > 
> 
> Yes, but it seems wrong to disable all of libsas if !ATA.  Only sas_ata.o
> should depend on that.
> 
> Darrick, is there any point in me carrying this tree?  It doesn't appear to
> be a hotbed of activity...

Nope.  I haven't worked on those bits of code in quite a while, since a
number of scsi/libata reorganizations were discussed at the storage
summit that would make a fair amount of the sas_ata code unnecessary (or
candidates for reworking).

--D

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature