On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 01:04:59AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Looks like SAS needs to require CONFIG_ATA... > > > > Yes, but it seems wrong to disable all of libsas if !ATA. Only sas_ata.o > should depend on that. > > Darrick, is there any point in me carrying this tree? It doesn't appear to > be a hotbed of activity... Nope. I haven't worked on those bits of code in quite a while, since a number of scsi/libata reorganizations were discussed at the storage summit that would make a fair amount of the sas_ata code unnecessary (or candidates for reworking). --D
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- References:
- 2.6.22-rc1-mm1
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22-rc1-mm1
- From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22-rc1-mm1
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22-rc1-mm1
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- 2.6.22-rc1-mm1
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] PowerPC64 symbols start with '.'
- Next by Date: [2.6.20.11] File system corruption with degraded md/RAID-5 device
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.22-rc1-mm1
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.22-rc1-mm1
- Index(es):
 |