Re: [PATCH] Kconfig powernow-k8 driver should depend on ACPI P-States driver

Duane Griffin wrote:

On 16/05/07, Prakash Punnoor <[email protected]> wrote:

Maybe you want to give a hint in the p states driver help text?

I think a hint is the right thing to do, but in the PowerNow! driver
rather than the p states one. How about adding something like this to
the X86_POWERNOW_K8 (and X86_POWERNOW_K7?) help text:

Please hold off this patch until we've gained a more complete understanding of the issues and workarounds (which will probably lead to us writing a better patch anyway)

Daniel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] Kconfig powernow-k8 driver should depend on ACPI P-States driver
    • From: Joshua Hoblitt <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] Kconfig powernow-k8 driver should depend on ACPI P-States driver
    • From: Joshua Hoblitt <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Kconfig powernow-k8 driver should depend on ACPI P-States driver
    • From: Prakash Punnoor <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Kconfig powernow-k8 driver should depend on ACPI P-States driver
    • From: "Duane Griffin" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: filesystem benchmarking fun
• Next by Date: [BUG] unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000003
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Kconfig powernow-k8 driver should depend on ACPI P-States driver
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Kconfig powernow-k8 driver should depend on ACPI P-States driver
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]