Re: Slab allocators: Define common size limitations

From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 23:32:39 -0700

> rofl. Really we shouldn't put this into 2.6.22, but it turfs out so much
> crap that it's hard to justify holding it back.

If fixes sparc64 with SLAB for one thing.  I was going to put
LARGE_ALLOCS back into sparc64/Kconfig but this is just soooo
much better.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Slab allocators: Define common size limitations
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: Slab allocators: Define common size limitations
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Slab allocators: Define common size limitations
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] prohibit rcutorture from being compiled into the kernel
• Previous by thread: Re: Slab allocators: Define common size limitations
• Next by thread: Re: Slab allocators: Define common size limitations
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]