Re: [PATCH] x86-64 highres/dyntick support 2.6.22-rc1-v4

On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 00:23 +0100, Alistair John Strachan wrote:
> > - TSC calibration against PM-Timer
> 
> Working fine now, thanks a lot. Great latencies on usleep() now too, just what 
> I was looking for.
> 
> (BTW, with HRT (but not NO_HZ), does the HZ value have any effect on usleep() 
> (and friends) latencies?)

Not directly.

	tglx


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] x86-64 highres/dyntick support
    • From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] x86-64 highres/dyntick support 2.6.22-rc1-v1
    • From: Alistair John Strachan <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH] x86-64 highres/dyntick support 2.6.22-rc1-v4
    • From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] x86-64 highres/dyntick support 2.6.22-rc1-v4
    • From: Alistair John Strachan <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: 2.6.21 numa policy and huge pages not working
• Next by Date: Re: Pagecache zeroing: zero_user_segment, zero_user_segments and zero_user
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86-64 highres/dyntick support 2.6.22-rc1-v4
• Next by thread: [PATCH] x86-64 highres/dyntick support 2.6.22-rc1-v5
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]