On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 10:46:21AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Wed, 16 May 2007 00:42:08 +0900 Mattia Dongili wrote:
...
> > Given the drivers/acpi/Kconfig portion
> >
> > if ACPI
> > ...
> > config ACPI_EC
> > bool
> > default y
> > help
> > ...
> >
> > config ACPI_POWER
> > bool
> > default y
> >
> > config ACPI_SYSTEM
> > bool
> > default y
> > help
> > ...
> > ...
> > endif
> >
> > I'd expect the 3 symbols to be all set when CONFIG_ACPI=y.
> > What am I overseeing?
>
> I think that this is just 'make randconfig' throwing a curve ball.
> ACPI depends on PM, but PM=n. In my experience, randconfig is a
> good tool for testing oddball configs, but the results are not
> always something that is fixable or needs to be fixed.
It looks like Kconfig does the right thing on i386 though. Not the same
on x84_64.
--
mattia
:wq!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
