On Tue, 15 May 2007, Heikki Orsila wrote:
> Both __pure and __attribute_pure__ are the same, and I found out that
> there is only a handful of users for these. __attribute_pure__ is
> used in approximately 15 places, and __pure is not used anywhere.
>
> Is either __pure or __attribute_pure__ preferred? Imo, __pure looks
> much nicer than __attribute_pure__ so we could do a replacement.
that was pretty much the point of my earlier post -- given the
precedent for all of the other short forms, there seems to be no
reason not to simply use "__pure" and delete the longer definition.
i'll post a patch for that shortly.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
