Re: [VOYAGER] fix build broken by shift to smp_ops

James Bottomley wrote:
> Let me do it.
>
> These are the two patches, tested and working on Voyager.
>
> The order of application is
>
> i386-common-smp.patch
> i386-fix-voyager-build.patch
>   

Yep, looks fine to me.  The only difference from the ones I just posted
appears to be a little bit of whitespace.

    J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [VOYAGER] fix build broken by shift to smp_ops
  - From: James Bottomley <[email protected]>
- Re: [VOYAGER] fix build broken by shift to smp_ops
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [VOYAGER] fix build broken by shift to smp_ops
  - From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: [VOYAGER] fix build broken by shift to smp_ops
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [VOYAGER] fix build broken by shift to smp_ops
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [VOYAGER] fix build broken by shift to smp_ops
  - From: James Bottomley <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: How to access correctly serial port inside module?
Next by Date: Re: Trivial string form cleanups
Previous by thread: Re: [VOYAGER] fix build broken by shift to smp_ops
Next by thread: USB adutux device number
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]