On Tuesday 15 May 2007 08:00, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 14 May 2007 10:50:54 +1000
>
> Con Kolivas <[email protected]> wrote:
> > akpm, please queue on top of "mm: swap prefetch improvements"
> >
> > ---
> > Failed radix_tree_insert wasn't being handled leaving stale kmem.
> >
> > The list should be iterated over in the reverse order when prefetching.
> >
> > Make the yield within kprefetchd stronger through the use of
> > cond_resched.
>
> hm.
>
> > - might_sleep();
> > - if (!prefetch_suitable())
> > + /* Yield to anything else running */
> > + if (cond_resched() || !prefetch_suitable())
> > goto out_unlocked;
>
> So if cond_resched() happened to schedule away, we terminate this
> swap-tricking attempt. It's not possible to determine the reasons for this
> from the code or from the changelog (==bad).
>
> How come?
Hmm I thought the line above that says "yield to anything else running" was
explicit enough. The idea is kprefetchd shouldn't run if any other real
activity is happening just about anywhere, and a positive cond_resched would
indicate likely activity so we just put kprefetchd back to sleep.
--
-ck
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
