On 5/14/07, Andreas Dilger <[email protected]> wrote:
On May 14, 2007 15:14 +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> #define EXT3_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_JOURNAL_DEV 0x0008 /* Journal device */
> #define EXT3_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_META_BG 0x0010
> +#define EXT3_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_WHITEOUT 0x0020
Is this flag reserved with Ted? It isn't listed in the e2fsprogs repo.
I don't know. I tried to contact him a few weeks ago but failed.
Guess, maybe he isn't reading the @thunk.org email anymore which was
reference in the e2fsprogs source I used.
Ted,
from ext2_fs.h I learn that the value 0x0020 is left unused.
#define EXT2_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_META_BG 0x0010
#define EXT3_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_EXTENTS 0x0040
#define EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_64BIT 0x0080
Is this intentionally?
Cheers,
Jan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
