On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 09:28:07PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > And we really complained about it! The oprofile thing should be fixed,
> > btw, and yeah,if udev breaks any more, I'll have to stop taking patches
> > from Greg. That thing has been a disaster, and everybody involved should
> > be ashamed and now hopefully *very* aware of the fact that we don't break
> > user-level interfaces.
> >
> > (Right now, I suspect we may have a loop setup regression. Not sure)
>
> While I'm all for keeping things relatively stable and not asking the
> user to constantly upgrade user-space, I believe that we just can't
> promise to never break user-level interfaces while keeping the
> development pace we have right now. We can promise to grant people
> significant delay before we drop compatibility options, but "forever"
> doesn't scale.
never with a loong deprecations period. At least for APIs that are not
private to a single obscure driver. But this would require people actually
beeing aware of creating ABIs, and maybe someone with half a clue reviewing
them. Which of course is not the case today, thanks to ioctls, procfs, sysfs,
debugfs and co people can create userspace ABIs without a single though
easily, and they happily do it.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
