Re: [PATCH] timekeeping fix mismerge

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 11:58 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Urgh, that was probably me trying to manage the maelstrom from a million
> monkeys mucking in the same code for multiple months, sigh.
> 
> So what do "broke" and "fix" mean in this context?  What are the
> consequences of this bug, and of its fix?  Is the above appropriate for
> 2.6.21.x and if so why?

clocksource_resume() is not called except from
unregister_time_interpolator(), which is definitely the wrong place.

No 2.6.21.x material, as the move of the timekeeping code happened after
2.6.21.

	tglx


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux