On May 13 2007 12:48, James Bottomley wrote: > >> Why does ATA select SCSI anyway? Surely PATA doesn't require it? > >That's a bit offtopic and to the wrong list. > >libata-pata does require SCSI ... And in the long run, that SCSI parts which are actually used by ATA should be factored out so that SCSI really is SCSI again, and not "Common layer for SCSI, SATA and PATA" or so. Jan -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely module?
- From: "Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]>
- Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely module?
- From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
- Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely module?
- From: James Bottomley <[email protected]>
- Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely module?
- From: "Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]>
- Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely module?
- From: James Bottomley <[email protected]>
- Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely module?
- From: Simon Arlott <[email protected]>
- Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely module?
- From: James Bottomley <[email protected]>
- why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely module?
- Prev by Date: Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc1
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.21-mm1 and now 2.6.21-git: SLUB Crashes on boot - crypto?
- Previous by thread: Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely module?
- Next by thread: Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely module?
- Index(es):
 |