At Sat, 12 May 2007 15:10:27 +0200,
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 19:39 +0900, Satoru Takeuchi wrote:
> > Fix Touchscreen driver for UCB1x00-based touchscreens to use
> > sched_setscheduler() instead of setting the fields of task_struct directly.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Satoru Takeuchi <[email protected]>
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6.21-fix-ucb-drivers/drivers/mfd/ucb1x00-ts.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.21-fix-ucb-drivers.orig/drivers/mfd/ucb1x00-ts.c 2007-05-11 18:53:36.000000000 +0900
> > +++ linux-2.6.21-fix-ucb-drivers/drivers/mfd/ucb1x00-ts.c 2007-05-11 19:33:20.000000000 +0900
> > @@ -214,8 +214,9 @@ static int ucb1x00_thread(void *_ts)
> > * We could run as a real-time thread. However, thus far
> > * this doesn't seem to be necessary.
> > */
> > -// tsk->policy = SCHED_FIFO;
> > -// tsk->rt_priority = 1;
> > +// struct sched_param param = { .sched_priority = 1 };
> > +//
> > +// sched_setscheduler(tsk, SCHED_FIFO, ¶m);
>
> Can we please remove the unused code completely instead of replacing it
> by more commented out code ?
It's OK to me, but I'm not the driver writer and doesn't know how important
are those comments. If removing them is better for driver writers too, here
is the patch.
Thanks,
Satoru
---
Remove unnecesary comments on driver for UCB1x00-based touchscreens.
Signed-off-by: Satoru Takeuchi <[email protected]>
Index: linux-2.6.21-fix-ucb-drivers/drivers/mfd/ucb1x00-ts.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.21-fix-ucb-drivers.orig/drivers/mfd/ucb1x00-ts.c 2007-05-11 18:53:36.000000000 +0900
+++ linux-2.6.21-fix-ucb-drivers/drivers/mfd/ucb1x00-ts.c 2007-05-14 08:44:03.000000000 +0900
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ static inline int ucb1x00_ts_pen_down(st
}
/*
- * This is a RT kernel thread that handles the ADC accesses
+ * This is a kernel thread that handles the ADC accesses
* (mainly so we can use semaphores in the UCB1200 core code
* to serialise accesses to the ADC).
*/
@@ -210,13 +210,6 @@ static int ucb1x00_thread(void *_ts)
DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, tsk);
int valid;
- /*
- * We could run as a real-time thread. However, thus far
- * this doesn't seem to be necessary.
- */
-// tsk->policy = SCHED_FIFO;
-// tsk->rt_priority = 1;
-
valid = 0;
add_wait_queue(&ts->irq_wait, &wait);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
