Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Sun, 13 May 2007, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
>
>> In article <[email protected]> you wrote:
>>> in short, do *not* remove its "deprecated" status. rather, remove its
>>> "obsolete" status and *make* it deprecated.
>> it is deprecated and obsolete.
>
> no, it's not. and, trust me, no one on this list wants me to have to
> explain all that again. :-)
So why don't we simply say:
- "Users of feature A are urged to migrate to alternative B."
- "Feature C will be removed in February 2038."
Everybody understands the meaning of /that/.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== -=-= -==-=
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
