Re: undeprecate raw driver.

Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Sun, 13 May 2007, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> 
>> In article <[email protected]> you wrote:
>>> in short, do *not* remove its "deprecated" status.  rather, remove its
>>> "obsolete" status and *make* it deprecated.
>> it is deprecated and obsolete.
> 
> no, it's not.  and, trust me, no one on this list wants me to have to
> explain all that again.  :-)

So why don't we simply say:

  - "Users of feature A are urged to migrate to alternative B."
  - "Feature C will be removed in February 2038."

Everybody understands the meaning of /that/.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== -=-= -==-=
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: undeprecate raw driver.
    • From: Bob Johnston <[email protected]>
  • Re: undeprecate raw driver.
    • From: Tilman Schmidt <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: undeprecate raw driver.
    • From: Bernd Eckenfels <[email protected]>
  • Re: undeprecate raw driver.
    • From: "Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] make sysctl/kernel/core_pattern and fs/exec.c agree on maximum core filename size
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] make cancel_rearming_delayed_work() reliable
• Previous by thread: Re: undeprecate raw driver.
• Next by thread: Re: undeprecate raw driver.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]