jimmy bahuleyan wrote:
i believe, the doc here is pretty unambiguous regarding the fact that volatile should be avoided. And as Stefan pointed out, anyone who feels the need to use, must surely _know_ what he is doing & hence is in a position t make that decision
Honestly, the above quoted paragraph states the situation better than any long, complicated document.
Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH] "volatile considered harmful", take 3
- From: Jonathan Corbet <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] "volatile considered harmful", take 3
- From: "Satyam Sharma" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] "volatile considered harmful", take 3
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] "volatile considered harmful", take 3
- From: "Satyam Sharma" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] "volatile considered harmful", take 3
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] "volatile considered harmful", take 3
- From: "Satyam Sharma" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] "volatile considered harmful", take 3
- From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] "volatile considered harmful", take 3
- From: jimmy bahuleyan <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] "volatile considered harmful", take 3
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] scalable rw_mutex
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] "volatile considered harmful", take 3
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] "volatile considered harmful", take 3
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] "volatile considered harmful", take 3
- Index(es):
 |