Re: FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI is not quite there

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andrew Morton wrote:
Well yup.  We're kind of waiting for someone to reply
to http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/7/129

Seems to be the same or at least related.

On comment about my first mail: this is the correct code of condvars, despite what I wrote before. I wasn't thinking clear. The internal futex is a normal futex. It is the job of the CMP_REQUEUE_PI call to figure this out, select the waiter with the highest priority, and boost the priority if necessary based on the targer futex which always is a PI futex.

--
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux