Re: [patch 2/2] Slab allocators: Drop support for destructors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] Slab allocators: Drop support for destructors
From: Pekka Enberg <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 20:55:17 +0300
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], Paul Mundt <[email protected]>
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Macintosh/20070221)

[email protected] wrote:

There is no user of destructors left. There is no reason why we should
keep checking for destructors calls in the slab allocators.


Looks good to me.

Acked-by: Pekka Enberg <[email protected]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [patch 0/2] Remove destructor support from slab allocators
  - From: [email protected]
- [patch 2/2] Slab allocators: Drop support for destructors
  - From: [email protected]

Prev by Date: Re: [Bug 8464] New: autoreconf: page allocation failure. order:2, mode:0x84020
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Fix section mismatch
Previous by thread: [patch 2/2] Slab allocators: Drop support for destructors
Next by thread: Re: [patch 2/2] Slab allocators: Drop support for destructors
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux