On Fri, 11 May 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> given how nice this looks already, have you considered completely
> replacing rwsems with this? I suspect you could test the correctness of
> that without doing a mass API changeover, by embedding struct rw_mutex
> in struct rwsem and implementing kernel/rwsem.c's API that way. (the
> real patch would just flip it all over to rw-mutexes)
Ummmm... How much memory would that cost on large systems?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]