Le jeudi 10 mai 2007 à 16:01 -0700, Christoph Lameter a écrit : > On Fri, 11 May 2007, Mel Gorman wrote: > > > Nicholas, could you backout the patch > > dont-group-high-order-atomic-allocations.patch and test again please? > > The following patch has the same effect. Thanks > > Great! Thanks. The proposed patch did not apply + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + rm -rf linux-2.6.21 + /usr/bin/bzip2 -dc /builddir/build/SOURCES/linux-2.6.21.tar.bz2 + tar -xf - + STATUS=0 + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' + cd linux-2.6.21 ++ /usr/bin/id -u + '[' 499 = 0 ']' ++ /usr/bin/id -u + '[' 499 = 0 ']' + /bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w . + echo 'Patch #2 (2.6.21-mm2.bz2):' Patch #2 (2.6.21-mm2.bz2): + /usr/bin/bzip2 -d + patch -p1 -s + STATUS=0 + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' + echo 'Patch #3 (md-improve-partition-detection-in-md-array.patch):' Patch #3 (md-improve-partition-detection-in-md-array.patch): + patch -p1 -R -s + echo 'Patch #4 (bug-8464.patch):' Patch #4 (bug-8464.patch): + patch -p1 -s 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/pageblock-flags.h .rej 6 out of 6 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file mm/page_alloc.c.rej Backing out dont-group-high-order-atomic-allocations.patch worked and seems to have cured the system so far (need to charge it a bit longer to be sure) -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: [Bug 8464] New: autoreconf: page allocation failure. order:2, mode:0x84020
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [Bug 8464] New: autoreconf: page allocation failure. order:2, mode:0x84020
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [Bug 8464] New: autoreconf: page allocation failure. order:2, mode:0x84020
- From: [email protected] (Mel Gorman)
- Re: [Bug 8464] New: autoreconf: page allocation failure. order:2, mode:0x84020
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [Bug 8464] New: autoreconf: page allocation failure. order:2, mode:0x84020
- From: [email protected] (Mel Gorman)
- Re: [Bug 8464] New: autoreconf: page allocation failure. order:2, mode:0x84020
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [Bug 8464] New: autoreconf: page allocation failure. order:2, mode:0x84020
- From: [email protected] (Mel Gorman)
- Re: [Bug 8464] New: autoreconf: page allocation failure. order:2, mode:0x84020
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [Bug 8464] New: autoreconf: page allocation failure. order:2, mode:0x84020
- From: [email protected] (Mel Gorman)
- Re: [Bug 8464] New: autoreconf: page allocation failure. order:2, mode:0x84020
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [Bug 8464] New: autoreconf: page allocation failure. order:2, mode:0x84020
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] UDF: check for allocated memory for inode data
- Next by Date: Re: [patch 05/10] Linux Kernel Markers - i386 optimized version
- Previous by thread: Re: [Bug 8464] New: autoreconf: page allocation failure. order:2, mode:0x84020
- Next by thread: Re: [Bug 8464] New: autoreconf: page allocation failure. order:2, mode:0x84020
- Index(es):
 |