Re: [RFC] memory hotremove patch take 2 [02/10] (make page unused)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 10 May 2007 11:04:37 -0700 (PDT)
Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Wed, 9 May 2007, Yasunori Goto wrote:
> 
> > This patch is for supporting making page unused.
> > 
> > Isolate pages by capturing freed pages before inserting free_area[],
> > buddy allocator.
> > If you have an idea for avoiding spin_lock(), please advise me.
> 
> Using the zone lock instead may avoid to introduce another lock? Or is the 
> new lock here for performance reasons?
> 
> Isnt it possible to just add another flavor of pages like what Mel has 
> been doing with reclaimable and movable? I.e. add another category of free 
> pages to Mel's scheme called isolated and use Mel's function to move stuff 
> over there?
> 
Mel-san's idea seems good. So we'll rewrite the whole this patch.

Thank you.
-Kame

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux