Re: [PATCH] Introduce boot based time

Hi John and Tomas, 

On Thursday 10 May 2007, john stultz wrote:
> I'm not sure I follow this. 
> 
> total_sleep_time stores seconds. So on 32bit systems that's 130some
> years, so it shouldn't be an issue.
> 
> Is the reason you want it to be a ktime is because you want a way to
> keep sub-second sleep granularity?

No, I'm just overworked and getting sloppy :-/ 

Sorry for the noise...

Best regards

Ingo Oeser
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: Broken process startup times after suspend (regression)
    • From: john stultz <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Introduce boot based time
    • From: Ingo Oeser <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Introduce boot based time
    • From: john stultz <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: (hacky) [PATCH] silence MODPOST section mismatch warnings
• Next by Date: Re: [1/2] [NET] link_watch: Move link watch list into net_device
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Introduce boot based time
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Introduce boot based time
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]