Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v11

[Kasper Sandberg <lkml@metanurb.dk>]

On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 18:59 +0200, Christian wrote:
> Hello lkml, hello Ingo!
> 
> I've been using CFS-v10 for a few days and I must say that I'm verry 
> impressed ;-)
> 
> Desktop performance without any manual renicing is excellent, even with 
> make -j20. Gaming performance is at least on par with SD now! I've tried to 
Which games are you trying? and have you tried other workloads then make
-j20?

try have a window with some 3d game open, and a browser besides it, and
press a link. i cant seem to get smooth results with CFS.

Perhaps i could also conduct tests with the games you are trying on my
hardware.

> change the sched_load_smoothing config to "8" but there is no visible 
> difference when it's set to "7".
> 
> Both schedulers are verrry good! I can't really tell which one is better.
> I noticed that while compiling a kernel (with -j4) my CPU temperature is two 
> to three degrees hotter than with mainline. I have not done any timing tests, 
> but I suspect that it's a little faster while preserving excellent desktop 
> usability. Great work!! :-)
> 
> -Christian
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/