On May 10 2007 16:49, Bodo Eggert wrote:
>
>Just because you limit yourself to 80 chars minus "ls -l"-clutter, this is
>no reason why I shouldn't use long filenames. If I need to handle these
>filenames, I can enlarge the terminal window or read the next line.
>
>E.g.: I have a music file named "artist - title.ext", where the artist
>name is 103 characters long, using abbreviations. In order to enter that
>name, I have to press seven keys, including the escape character.
>There is nothing unreasonable in using that name.
What name would that be? I cannot dream up any IME that outputs _that_
many characters for that few keystrokes. Even with CJ(K), 7 keystrokes can
make at most 21 bytes if I had to take a good guess.
Jan
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
