Re: [PATCH 2/3] Add hard_irq_disable()

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>]

On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 01:53 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 01:50:36 -0700
> 
> > We discussed this a couple of months back.  davem landed firmly in the
> > second camp and everyone then shut up ;)
> 
> No I landed in the first :-)))
> 
> I think the empty lines are a waste and only serve to eat
> up precious screen real-estate when reading code.
> 
> It is possible that I used to use the empty line thing in
> the past, but I definitely don't do that any more.

Yup, I used to do the other one too but nowadays, I much prefer not
wasting that additional line unless specific circumstances, like I
want a kind of "title" in front of a whole block of other definitions
with their own comments.

Something like:


/*
 * foo management stuff
 */


/* This puts the bar in the foo
 */
code code code code

/* This does something you don't want to know about
 */
code code code code


But does it realy matter that much ? :-)

Cheers,
Ben.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/