Re: [GIT PULL] MMC updates

Russell King wrote:
> See the comments immediately above and below its use.
>
> Welcome to buggy hardware.
>
>   

I've read through the erratum, and to me it seems like the bug affects
all long replies, not just these codes. So I think the code should be
fixed to look at the response flag, not the opcode.

Do you have hardware so that you can test such a change?

-- 
     -- Pierre Ossman

  Linux kernel, MMC maintainer        http://www.kernel.org
  PulseAudio, core developer          http://pulseaudio.org
  rdesktop, core developer          http://www.rdesktop.org

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [GIT PULL] MMC updates
    • From: Pierre Ossman <[email protected]>
  • Re: [GIT PULL] MMC updates
    • From: Russell King <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [GIT PULL] MMC updates
    • From: Pierre Ossman <[email protected]>
  • Re: [GIT PULL] MMC updates
    • From: Russell King <[email protected]>
  • Re: [GIT PULL] MMC updates
    • From: Pierre Ossman <[email protected]>
  • Re: [GIT PULL] MMC updates
    • From: Russell King <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Section mismatch warnings (was Re: [PATCH] early_pfn_to_nid needs to be __meminit)
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH -mm] timer: parenthesis fix in tbase_get_deferrable() etc.
• Previous by thread: Re: [GIT PULL] MMC updates
• Next by thread: Re: [GIT PULL] MMC updates
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]