Adrian Bunk wrote:
It had been sent twice to both linux-kernel and netdev, and when going
through old linux-kernel emails I considered it trivial enough (people
might argue about dead email addresses, but not about dead URLs).
I could send such patches to Andrew for that he includes them in -mm and
therefore will include them in his huge list of "forward again and again
to the maintainer until there is any reaction" patches.
But IMHO for such trivial patches it's enough if the maintainer had the
chance to veto them.
Please follow the rule that everybody else follows: send to me and
netdev. It's that simple :)
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
