Alexander van Heukelum wrote: > > Hi! > > I'm making coffee now. I just don't see what I missed? Maybe you were > led astray by the new PARAM_VESA_PAD I added? > Again, I object to changing a documented interface when it's not necessary to do so. Just declare the structure packed. -hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Make bootsector stub 16-bit-only (i386)
- From: Alexander van Heukelum <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Make bootsector stub 16-bit-only (i386)
- References:
- [PATCH] Make bootsector stub 16-bit-only (i386)
- From: Alexander van Heukelum <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Make bootsector stub 16-bit-only (i386)
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Make bootsector stub 16-bit-only (i386)
- From: Alexander van Heukelum <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Make bootsector stub 16-bit-only (i386)
- From: "Antonino A. Daplas" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Make bootsector stub 16-bit-only (i386)
- From: Alexander van Heukelum <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] Make bootsector stub 16-bit-only (i386)
- Prev by Date: Re: Please revert 5adc55da4a7758021bcc374904b0f8b076508a11 (PCI_MULTITHREAD_PROBE)
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.21-mm2 - hanging with initcall_debug and netconsole
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Make bootsector stub 16-bit-only (i386)
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Make bootsector stub 16-bit-only (i386)
- Index(es):
 |