Pavel Machek wrote:
>> > Add try_to_freeze() calls to the remaining kernel threads that do not call
>> > try_to_freeze() already, although they set PF_NOFREEZE.
>> >
>> > In the future we are going to replace PF_NOFREEZE with a set of flags that
>> > will be set to indicate in which situations the task should not be frozen (for
>> > example, there can be a task that should be frozen for the CPU hotplugging and
>> > should not be frozen for the system suspend).
[...]
>> Why add no-op-try_to_freeze() everywhere now, instead of adding it later
>> when it will actually be needed? (I.e. "in the future".)
>
> It is needed later in the patch series... for kprobes, etc.
So does freezer_exempt() still do what its name says, or does it
freezer_exempt_but_not_always() now?
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== -=-= -=--=
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
